homeproperty locator
development resources downtown living ddd incentives clean & safe outside resources

City Council Candidate Questions

Candidates for New Orleans City Council At-Large and Districts B & C were asked to respond to the following questions posed by the Downtown Development District Board of Commissioners. Candidates were given the option to respond in person or with written statements. The questions and the candidates' exact answers, whether in writing or in person, are posted below. The DDD is grateful for the candidates' participation. We hope the information provided herein is helpful to Downtown stakeholders as you evaluate the candidates.

Note: Candidates Clarkson, Fielkow, Gant, Willard-Lewis and Palmer responded via an in-person interview. Their responses were recorded by an independent court reporter. Candidate Stacy Head provided a written statement.

University Medical Center and Bioscience Industry

Since soon after Hurricane Katrina, the DDD has played a prominent and important role in advocating for the construction of new Veterans Affairs and University medical centers. The DDD believes that the construction of these facilities is critically important to 1) improving access to leading edge medical care for Louisianians of every background, 2) ensuring training for a steady stream of health care professionals for the entire state, and 3) laying the foundation for a much-needed growth industry for New Orleans: bioscience.

Do you support building the University Medical Center on the site selected by the State of Louisiana? How would you support the efforts to create a state of the art medical and bioscience district within and adjacent to Downtown?

Responses
Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE
First, yes, I support all of the above because it's the State's decision to pick their site. It's not our decision. It's not our site. It's not our hospital. I wrote the first genetic testing bill in the State of Louisiana, one of the first in the country. And at that point, became a part of what was a team, a created team by Governor Foster that led to clinical trials, gene therapy consortium and eventually the cancer center which was Tulane and LSU Medical Schools that's NIH, National Institute of Health, designated. That's probably one of a kind in the country, a public medical school -- or a private medical school that's nationally designated. And it's half built on the corner of Claiborne and Tulane. It's a reality. It's here today. And that with the VA and LSU co-located with Tulane and Xavier with all the gene therapy and genetic testing and clinical trial programs that are in place and have been going on for ten years with the cancer center, which will open in two years, we have created a biomedical district. And it will be the entity that will become the City's greatest source of economic development and the largest source of high-paying jobs, not just in the medical field but all -- in the -- the medical field, but it will also be all of these ancillary services to the medical field when you create that big of an industry. We will finally rival South Birmingham and M.D. Anderson, which we should have done 30 years ago. So I've been a part of this system and a part of this happening wherever I could be privately and publicly, State and City for 30 years since my husband ran the Department of Medicine at LSU Medical School. I have always believed we could compete with M.D. Anderson. And I was violently upset when a cowtown of South Birmingham passed us up. So it's time to get serious, and it's time to take the center stage. State of the art medicine, top-quality jobs and it's right downtown in our City of New Orleans.
Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE
Well, as you know, I have worked with many people from DDD and related entities on these joint projects. I believe the biomed corridor presents a once in a lifetime opportunity for this City to advance, both economically and also from a health care perspective. So, I have been and remain a supporter of really three new hospitals that I hope take place in New Orleans; the VA, the new LSU, and eventually and hopefully soon a hospital in New Orleans East. I do support the concept of the proposed sites for both the VA and the LSU hospitals. I think it's vitally important, though, that as soon as we can, that the arbitration matter gets resolved so we know what kind of dollars are going to be available. There's a big gap between what FEMA has offered and what LSU is suggesting as fair reimbursement. And we need to get that answer in order to put the entire financing package together. So that final decisions can be made and we can move forward. Should the dollars be short and should we not prevail in the way that I think many of us would like to have happen in the arbitration, we're going to need to, you know, revisit the issue and get very creative in terms of what the financing alternatives might be. And I commend Governor Jindal for staying firm on this issue and remaining supportive. Assuming we are going to build those two hospitals on the proposed sites, there are a couple of things that absolutely must happen, though, for this to be a successful venture. One is all of those that might be affected -- homeowners and businesses that are in the footprint of the hospitals -- need to receive fair and complete compensation. We have asked many of those folks to come back after Katrina. They have rebuilt homes and businesses, and they absolutely legally and ethically deserve to be treated appropriately. Second thing is we cannot leave the existing Charity Hospital and its buildings in a vacant or a blighted condition. There needs to be a community-wide discussion on readaptive use that would be beneficial for the City with input from many stakeholders because there should be no discussion of tearing down the Charity building. They're historic and important to this community, and we need to have some real good community wide and maybe national discussion on the best ways to reuse that building.
William Gant
AT-LARGE
I'm a little ambivalent about where they want to put it. I've seen many neighborhoods destroyed. And my full concern is what are we going to do with the property that housed Charity Hospital before. I think that need to be cleared up also. Now, I'm conscious of the fact that bio-science and the medical corridor is going to be an awful big job providers. Whatever happen, whatever decisions are made, I hope they are done with some expediency so that those jobs, which is critical now for our City, as jobs are being -- especially governmental jobs are being wiped out and being reduced -- we need to have a job engine also, and we need to have that pretty quick. So, I'm not opposed to where the State is putting it. But I'm not opposed to keeping it at its present location either. Especially if there's no plan for that location in place.
Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE
I think that the biomedical science complex, with all of the construction jobs that it would create as well as the high-paying center of excellence, of research and of compassionate, competent care is perhaps the most exciting economic development project in the city of New Orleans in a prospective and visionary way since the founding of this City. Just as the founding of New Orleans helped create the greatness of America, the creation of the biomedical science corridor with all of its possibilities: Healthcare, research, a synergy to our families, to those that are outside to come to New Orleans for the services that they are receiving in other areas, whether it's M.D. Anderson or all of the other outstanding medical facilities, to have the one in New Orleans will, perhaps, draw many of our families back as well as attract and build upon a relationship we had in the past in the '60s with the Ochsner medical corridor and the Americas, CentRal America and South America, we can re-brand ourselves again, not only as a center of medical excellence in America, in Southern America, but also in the world and all of the Americas. So the potential is great. I support it. And while I am a Charity Hospital baby and worked with the Honorable Avery Caesar Alexander and understand that that is an historic building, I don't think that you can cram a new biomedical facility with such capacity into an old existing building with the infrastructure and technology limitations. I do, however, support the Master Plan concept of visioning with the community to talk about appropriate and fitting uses. And I certainly think that with all of the Charity Hospital babies that are now in the community contributing, thought to a well-baby clinic or focusing on the wellness of children would certainly be a legacy project deserving of not only the building but the significance of the role that the building played. Complimentary uses, yes, that honor the history and also provide a need for the people of the City. And I certainly think there would be no greater tribute than, you know, a well-baby clinic or services for the children, bringing life to the building, you know, the joy of laughter, including a daycare center for the working families in the downtown area, perhaps even those who will be employed at the medical corridor.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

With the recent announcement of the FEMA award of over $400M to LSU for Charity, it appears likely that LSU will, in fact, obtain the funding needed to build a new hospital. While I do not think that the current site selection is the best option available. I remain convinced that reuse of Charity was not carefully explored and would have been a better site. That said, given LSU’s decision to build on the mid-city site and the positive impact that the LSU and VA hospital will have city-wide, I will support LSU’s and the VA’s decisions.

I have assigned a staff member to stay abreast of all Bioscience District activities and attend meetings. Through this close interaction, I am able to champion efforts to bring more research dollars and health-care and research related businesses.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C
Yes, I'm absolutely in support of the new hospitals. However, I do wish that they would be done as quickly as possible. I think that we have inherited a mess through the faulty implementation of what's occurred. I would love for the DDD to take the lead on it. Because you were so successful. I think the model that you created for the height study, when we talk about bringing together preservationists and developers, if that same model could be applied, I think it would happen quickly. I think that's what's needed right now. I want -- this VA Hospital has to happen. It has to happen as quickly as possible. I would advocate for it to happen as quickly as possible. I think one of the benefits of my candidacy is the fact that I've often worked with the preservationist groups and the business groups and come to successful conclusions. That's really what we need to push this through. We need someone that understands both sides of the issue and that will help be a strong advocate for it. I also believe -- I will go on Record with this -- that we cannot disclude -- not dismiss shall we say -- the conversation about the Charity Hospital existing structure. Because we're looking at a million square foot building. If that's going to be adjacent to any new development, it's going to negatively impact it. So I would really strongly hope that the DDD would talk about some type of redevelopment for that building that would be a benefit to the entire City. If we don't have that discussion, then I don't think it's a true discussion when we talk about that, absent voters in the City. But before all that happens, I am first and foremost a huge proponent of getting the VA Hospital built as quickly as possible for many and multiple layers. Right now the City is at a crisis with our health system. Our people are at a crisis and our quality of life is at a crisis. I see it firsthand within my family. I have a family member that has to leave the City to get good health care. And that's really not something any of us wants to have happen with this City. I will say that my conversations -- you can imagine that just from my line of work of being in development and being an active participant from all levels, both the business side and community side, that if there was strong leadership on that issue, everybody that I -- expressed the exact same opinion that I do. First and foremost we have to have the VA Hospital built. So if there was a lead agency on this that has the trust of the people, that could happen much faster.

Sidewalk and Infrastructure Repair

In 2006, the DDD presented a plan to do a partial rather than a full rollback of the DDD tax rate subsequent to the citywide property tax assessment, in order to provide earmarked funding to assist the City in repairing broken sidewalks Downtown. The plan was not adopted by the City. The need to fix Downtown’s sidewalks and other City owned infrastructure still exists and is made more urgent as the eyes of the world will be on New Orleans during the NCAA Men’s Final Four in 2012 and the Super Bowl in 2013.

How would you propose to work with the DDD to fix Downtown sidewalks, streets and other infrastructure prior to 2012?

Responses

Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE

Well, first of all, we should dedicate funds for maintenance to downtown because it's not like other parts of the City. The whole City uses downtown. The whole City uses parts of the CBD and the French Quarter. There should be a dedication of funds that where -- especially where there's private investment. DDD is private investment. We won't continue to get private investment and nonprofit investment in this City if we don't come to the table with City money to maintain it. When something that's in the benefit of the City is created through other sources than the City, we should -- the least we can do is dedicate funds to maintain it.
Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE
I think there are several sources of potential funding. Obviously, all of us share the goal of making the streets and the sidewalks safe and customer friendly, especially with all of those international events coming to our City. I think the possible sources of funding that we need to look at, obviously, are City dollars that come out of our general fund and the capital budget. We need to look at the potential for bond money and whether there is any opportunities there. And the third is I was very encouraged by the announcement this week on the consolidation of the hospitality industry and their focus on finding dedicated revenue streams that might be earmarked and put back into hospitality/tourism related functions. That's very important. I will be interested to see where that discussion goes, specifically what the ideas might be. But I think it's important to recognize for every dollar we put into our tourism and hospitality areas which are within the geographic confines of the DDD, there's a return on investment many times over. I think we need -- it will be important once the new mayor comes, once a new Council is seated, you know, to sit in partnership with DDD and the tourism industry and look at the funding streams that might exist to try to make necessary infrastructure improvements.
William Gant
AT-LARGE
And that's a good question. I really don't have a concrete answer for that because I don't know what the City is doing with you at this particular time. I do understand the need to keep the facade, to keep it looking good. I mean, who wants to visit a City that is run down and broken. And so I would be amenable to whatever needed to be done in order to make that happen to keep it attractive. But I do understand the City is in pretty dread need of income now, revenue, especially with sales tax collection being much lower than what it was prior to Katrina. So, that may be a problem there. Now, I don't know if there's other sources of revenue that can cover some of those expenditures. That would have to be looked at.
Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE
Well, I think that it is a collaborative with the retailers, the people who are -- and the employees, the ones who are currently Downtown, the families that live in the area, work in the area as well as all of the strategic assets around the Downtown area from our office buildings to our governmental complexes, that we need to have discussions on a plan of action and that talk about safety, that talk -- and safety from an infrastructure perspective. I don't know how many slip-and-falls, broken ankles, broken -- you know, situations because of crumbling sidewalks and/or crumbling curb-cuts. But, again, to lay the groundwork and the foundation for success, I think it is always an inclusive dialogue of the front-line users, your customer base. And your customer base is extremely inclusive and very comprehensive. And the people who are walking the path daily would be the front-line in terms of advocates.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

Significant dollars remain available from Hurricane Katrina and Rita federal grants. That money should be used for downtown sidewalk repairs. In addition, if the city’s ad valorem taxation system is improved through equitable citywide assessments, the millage rate will go down. At that point, I would support a roll-forward in the DDD millage for the express purpose of infrastructure improvement.
Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C
I would be very much prepared to move forward with it. It is something that I've consistently heard throughout the business owners, also through the French Quarter. It's abysmal. And it's -- people comment consistently on watching visitors, on watching residents stumble, trip, fall, etc. And it's inexcusable. It can be fixed relatively quickly. And I would be a full proponent.

Canal Street Sidewalk Maintenance

The Downtown Development District and Canal Street Development Corporation spent $17 million in 2005 & 2006 to remake the Canal Street streetscape with new sidewalk pavers, trees, and improved lighting. The remake has been well-received by stakeholders and the general public. The streetscape needs ongoing maintenance, however – particularly brick pavers that from time to time need resetting. DPW insists it has no resources to maintain the sidewalks.

What is your plan to ensure that this $17 million investment continues to enhance quality of life and investment opportunities on New Orleans’ main street for years to come?

Responses
Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE
Same thing. That should be -- no, that should be in the dedication of City funds. We won't continue to attract the best of investment to downtown if they don't see that the City is doing its part. And I've always believed in that. I believed in that as a realtor before I was a -- a Councilwoman because you just don't keep private business coming and investing if the City doesn't show that it does its share.
Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE

I think the answer is similar to the one that I just gave. I think we have to look at all the potential funding sources, including general fund/DPW dollars, capital dollars, potentially bond money, and potentially dedicated earmarked tourism dollars to try to insure that there's a maintenance fund that continues to exist and that can take care of the improvements. The streetscape improvements have been outstanding. They have changed the face of Canal Street and the Downtown area for the better. We need to make sure that we continue those and enhance those. Obviously, maintaining is a big piece of that. So, again, you would have my full support on that topic. We just need to sit down in partnership with the leaders of the City and identify the appropriate funding source.

William Gant
AT-LARGE
Again, a lot depends on increasing the revenue flow to the City. Because to me that will be a big problem as we go forward into the future. If we don't get any additional revenue streams or improved sales collection revenue, then we're going to have difficulty sharing the meager resources with all the shareholders that really need it. But we fully understand how important it is to keep Downtown looking great. It is the largest economic engine that we have. And we need to protect that because then if we can protect that, then the spillover -- the spillover effect will be able to generate more revenues. For instance, I think North Claiborne from Canal to Elysian Field have to be looked at. I don't know -- I know it's not a part of Downtown Development, but at one time it was a great revenue source long before they put all the trees there. I think we believe that it can be that again. But therein, we need to be able to have the City support as well as DDD
Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE
Well, you know, you're actually -- I mean, you're very correct when you point out the issue of the challenge of maintenance, and that is for all of our infrastructure. We'll get a pot of money for construction, but then to make sure and that the life of the project is full to fruition, you've got to have that regular and consistent maintenance that supports the new construction. And it is a challenge in terms of the Department of Public Works. However, when you understand that the Downtown Development District area is the face of New Orleans to so many who are not from our City. It is our international face. It is the front door from an international perspective as well as the fact that it is the source for jobs for many of our local citizens. From that perspective, one can argue the need for maintenance and deal with a very challenged department to be creative in terms of responses; because oftentimes Bill Cappo has to come out with his camera to get the attention of the Department of Public Works. And it has been a terrible challenge for me especially and for all of the District Council Members, I am sure, in these past four years since the storm, to get maintenance going. So I think you set it as a priority and you identify resources within the budget that talk about critical projects, city-wide as well as in the districts; and, again, with the stakeholders articulating in the budget cycle the value and the importance, hopefully it is focused on.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

My answer to the question above applies to an extent to this question. In addition, I hope to champion a Canal Street Tax Increment Financing program, which revenue will be used, in part, to maintain the street’s infrastructure. Finally, I agree that the public works department is underfunded. Our city spends far less on street maintenance than cities of comparable size. This must change through proper budgeting priorities.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C
Well, I think I just stated I would assist in putting forth the issue from the City Council. Again, to get back on Record, I really am looking also at a management agency as also having a role to play, at least with the streets in the French Quarter and the streets and the sidewalks.

Perception of Safety

A recent DDD Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey showed that Downtown property owners, workers, residents, and visitors recognize the positive changes occurring Downtown, especially the redevelopment of older buildings for residential & other uses. The research also showed that there is a perception, especially among those less familiar with Downtown, that Downtown is not as safe as crime statistics indicate. It also showed that seeing more police patrolling on foot, horseback & other accessible ways would help to address this concern.

How would you address this public safety perception issue and the need for more police visibility to protect the economic engine of New Orleans?

Responses

Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE
First of all, I would support it as a Council member and, hopefully -- and plan to be leader of the Council, so I would definitely come out in support of it. I would propose it as legislation, if necessary, if I was not stepping on the toes of the District -- of the two District Council people from either side of Canal Street. But more importantly than that, I think the DDD should have the mayoral candidate commit -- commit in the hiring of a new police chief, which ought to be the first priority of a new mayor, that there will be a written plan not only to expand the force immediately but to have community policing and to include the horseback and the visibility and all of the safety features. For the 20 years that I have been in government, we can document in the downtown from the CBD to Canal Street to the French Quarter, we can document that that makes a difference. It does make a difference in actual crime control, and it makes an even bigger difference in perception in bringing not only tourism here but major permanent investment.
Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE

Well, crime prevention remains and for the next few years will be the top priority of the City still. We have a crime problem in New Orleans. Both perception and reality. And I believe that while we're making some strides from a mid-term and long-term standpoint systemically and there's been a cooperation between the criminal justice elements, we are still suffering on the short term. It will be very important once the new police chief is hired that that police chief sit with the stakeholders and talk seriously about how do we protect the entire City, but in particular in this case with the DDD, those visitors that have come to New Orleans. There has to be new strategies and deployment, new crime reporting methodologies, better technology, and just other strategies that have worked in other parts of the country, especially in some of our, again, revenue-producing areas. The DDD has done an outstanding job of supplementing some of our criminal justice protection that we have right now. But, I think, whether you go into the French Quarter or into the neighborhoods or Downtown areas I think there's still a great concern for safety in the City. It's something that we have to work on each and every day if we're going to keep this vital and vibrant area of our community successful.

William Gant
AT-LARGE

I think a lot of the perception have to do with what's going on, not so much Downtown, but around town. You know, I mean, we have a lot of crime, especially murders that's occurring in our City now. So, the key is how to address that because as long as you have these negative perceptions going out to folks who will be visiting our City -- we are a tourist and we're going to continue to be a tourist attraction with conventioneering -- but if those people feel unsafe, then there's a problem of perception and that can't be changed overnight. More police is good. But that's not going to be all that you need to solve the problem. We will focus in on those sectors of the City where crime is more prevalent. And we believe if we can reduce crime in those areas, then the effect will be a better perception of our City overall. Meaning, that a lot of crime is economic driven in our part of the world. I'm talking about the urban and older suburban communities. So, we believe if we could get the support of the DDD in order to create more business start-ups in these areas, that will go along with and reduce the joblessness in those, areas, create training facilities and things of that nature and business ownership, I believe that's a part of that whole process. That's not going to be done overnight. A lot of candidates talk about more police, a different police chief. But I have been hearing that story for the last 30, 40 years. And we have changed police chiefs. We have put a lot of people in jail. But the problem continue to grow. And unless it's solved on that end, it's not -- the perception is not going to change. What I'm concerned about more than anything is the spill-over effect. Because criminals will go where there's money. There's money in the CBD. When you rob me, you might get some food stamps. But when you come Downtown, you may get a pocket full of cash. Eventually, what's going to happen is that it's going to spill over and the perception is going to become reality. Which it may be now. I believe a lot more be happening now in this area than what's being reported. I can understand that. If a lot of crime is being reported, then the perception grows and grow larger.

Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE

Well, I think you're absolutely correct. It's a perception, because oftentimes when I am Downtown, I see the hard-working men and women of the Eighth and even of the First. They are patrolling. They are in their vehicles. They're on their feet. And so I think you've got to begin a messaging campaign about safety, and you should use the officers themselves in terms of talking about who they are and what beat they walk and, in addition to that, using the customers who feel safe and who know that they are protected. And, again, one of the strategies that I am advocating when elected at the at-large position is to use the technology to identify hot spots. I am sure in the geographic area there perhaps are a few. But also zone in police officers to a particular geographic area so that there is a relationship and there is a direct line of accountability on all shifts, rather than having this mobility of moving from one area to another and vehicles constantly from one corridor to another corridor, have zone responsibility where an individual can take pride, build relationships. It is really the front line of community policing. You don't need a substation. You need officers who have relationships with the stores, the homes, and the businesses. And I think that that begins with individual officers knowing that this is the area that they are responsible for and that they are held accountable for.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

One of the main problems in the New Orleans Police Department is with regard to deployment. To put it succinctly, more police officers need to be on the streets in a visible way. I pledge to work with the new administration and the Independent Police Monitor to assure that our NOPD’s deployment practices improve.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C

Again, I'm a full proponent of community policing and the alternate forms that you just mentioned -- from bicycles, to scooters, walking -- adds to that perception of safety and security. I'm a full proponent of that.

Mechanical Street Sweeping

In 2007, as a result of cost cutting measures imposed by the City on its Downtown & French Quarter sanitation contractor, the City stopped all mechanical street sweeping Downtown, resulting in gravel and soot accumulating in street gutters throughout Downtown. The DDD provides enhanced sidewalk cleaning throughout Downtown, but without the City providing the basic, baseline City service of street sweeping, it is difficult for the DDD’s sidewalk cleaning contractor to make Downtown New Orleans one of the cleanest among major American cities, as is the DDD’s goal.

Are you prepared to renew the City’s mechanical street sweeping Downtown?
Responses
Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE

Absolutely. And everything we've just talked about for the last one, two, three, four -- the last four items are the exact same thing. It's an investment. It's not a cost. That's number one. Number two, we won't have your investment if we don't honor it with our -- with our investment, not only to continue it but also to maintain it. And we -- and that sets an example for the whole rest of the City in bringing in investment and in bringing in private development. And so there's a huge role here to be played that puts us on a very prominent stage right now. And it's critically important what -- the year that I was out of office and went back to working with major investors, and they were chomping at the bit to come invest in New Orleans. We're the land of opportunity right now. And we are -- we're being able to honor tax credits. And they offer tax credits in layers like it's never happened in American investment ever, to my knowledge, and I've been at it 40 years. And there was several things that stopped them. And one was crime, which we're beginning to get a handle on and that has to continue. But, secondly, was no rules, and that will end when the Master Plan is law. And thirdly, it was the fact that they don't want to invest their money where the City is not making a subsequent investment. And I heard that time after time from major investments to people buying a house. And so I think it's time -- and it shows more from downtown than anywhere. Canal Street should be the leader of the City, as it was when this was the Queen City of the South. We can go there again.

 

Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE
Well, I think the entire area of sanitation has obviously been a very hot public topic and, unfortunately, has become in many circles a very derisive topic. Again, like in other areas, this is one that once your new Mayor and Council are empaneled, it behooves the City for us to sit together and talk about overall sanitation, including the specific topic within the district that you're mentioning. We would, of course, like to provide those basic services that you have asked for. The challenge is how do we do so within the confines of a very tight and difficult budget and can we going forward afford to pay the percentage of the general fund budget that's being committed right now to the cleanliness of our City. You and I have been on trips around the country where we have been told one that of the key indicators of success is the cleanliness of a City. And I believe we have made great strides in that area. Our City is cleaner than it's ever been. So, our challenge is how do we keep it at that level and still be able to afford it. I don't have any magic wand in that area, other than hope that the DDD and its retailers are tremendously successful so that we can add more sales tax dollars to the pot that gives us more general fund dollars to be able to appropriate to areas like this.
William Gant
AT-LARGE

I would think that would be one of the priority on the list of priorities. If it could be done, it should be done. I'm -- I don't have access to the revenue flow, what it's about. But I have been through the Quarters prior when it was smelling like a sewerage. You know, so I know the difference. I don't know what it cost the City. I don't know whether it was all political, taking it down. I don't know about all of those things. But I do believe that if you are going to promote this area as a world class destination, then clean streets have to happen. Now, even if the City don't make it happen, then the stakeholders down here will have to find a way to make it happen. You know, I had a business for long time. I had to clean up in front of it myself to insure there was cleanliness. I didn't have anybody down sweeping the street. I had get out there and sweep the streets myself because I understood how important it was for people who are visiting my business to see a clean and hygienically sound business they were entering. So, yes. I'm for helping as much as possible.

Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE

I certainly think that it's a part of the package of services that we really have to look at in terms of making sure that we have a clean and safe Downtown. I think that once you begin and approach a strategy, you really can't reverse and you shouldn't regress. We should always be about moving forward and, at a minimum, holding the line of delivery of excellent services. Yes, there was a budgetary crisis, and I was one of the first of the Council Members to advocate and to support the administration's idea of the use of economic development funds because I get it. I get it. In terms of our tourist, in terms of our business community, cleanliness is next to Godliness and it sets the tone for a progressive area and that folks want to be a part of. And if it's dirty, if it's -- the appearance of, you know, debris and litter and, one, it's the broken pane. It's the broken-glass scenario. One broken glass then leads to the door getting kicked in which leads to, you know, the light post being broken which then leads to -- you know, it's the continuing scenario of a downward spin. And so I was one of the Council People, and we could have solved that problem a little bit earlier had we had the full appreciation of all of our colleagues that it was not about an individual's politics and it wasn't about people. It was about solving a problem, a very important part of our City where if you don't stay on top of the litter and the garbage, because of the complexity, the density, and the value of the area, you will really be -- you're back up against the wall. So I felt a sense of urgency, and I was one of the ones to sign on the dotted line immediately. However, some of my colleagues wanted to play politics and wanted to point fingers at individuals and create more crisis. I'm not about creating more crisis. I'm about eliminating the confusion and moving forward with a plan and strategy that makes everything work for the City of New Orleans. And I think it was shameful that the Downtown Development District and the cleanliness of it had to move backwards because of personality conflict and politics.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

This is something that I have lobbied for during the budget process for three years. I remain committed and hope that a majority of my colleagues, particularly the at-large members and the District C councilmember will support this effort to convince our new mayor of the importance of providing baseline street-sweeping services to the DDD.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C

Absolutely.

Historical Theatre District TIF

The Canal Street Development Strategy, completed in 2004 by the DDD & Canal Street Development Corporation and adopted by the City, has born great fruit. It led to the DDD’s successful effort in 2005 to expand the State Historic Tax Credit, the opening of eleven new stores & restaurants on Canal Street in the last year, and façade improvements on almost twenty Canal Street properties. The Canal Street historic theatre district at Basin & Rampart streets is proving to be more of a challenge. The DDD has determined that, short of an immediate, large, public cash infusion, the revitalization of the remaining theatre structures will require special financing such as a tax increment finance (TIF) district.

Are you supportive of a TIF for this purpose, in order to catalyze additional private investment surrounding the theatres?

What else do you propose to expedite the resurgence of Canal Street?

Responses

Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE

Absolutely support a TIF as long as I can be a part of writing it, because I did the Federal City TIF and it's been considered a role model and it worked. And it was not in -- it was not in the best interest of any one person. It was in the best interest of the public trust. And it did bring us Federal City, which is worth -- retained $4.5 billion in military, but is worth 10,000 high-paying jobs. And more importantly, I only -- we only spent $6 million of City money and it today is worth 750 million. That's what you can do if you do these resources or revenue correctly. They don't have to be for the benefit of one individual. They can be to the benefit of the City, if they're done properly. I would definitely support it as long as I can sign off on it. I know I get to vote for it, but I'd like to help write it.

Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE
Well, I have always publicly expressed support for use of incentive vehicles that provide economic return to the City. Whether they be Pilot programs through the industrial board or TIFs that are handled by the City. Especially in the stage where New Orleans is at right now, I believe we still need to continue to incentivize to create development. One of the things the City did not have, though, was a formal TIF policy. We were doing it on an ad hoc basis. That has changed. With the help of our current City Council, we now have a formal policy that is strict and utilizes good tests to determine whether a project needs financial help. I would be -- without prejudging any particular project because it has to come in front of the Council for approval -- I would be supportive of the use of TIF in order to leverage and incentivize private development in the theater area and in other cultural assets to try to get us off the side. We can't -- if we're going to rebuild the Downtown area, you can't have one section of Canal Street falling behind the other. And that's what we have right now. And I think the recreation of our theaters, the reopening and rebranding of those theaters, and the productions and cultural talent that come with it will pay dividends long term for the City. So I would be very open to the use of TIFs. I just think we need to, you know, analyze each particular project on its own basis.

William Gant
AT-LARGE

Well, certainly TIF is a very important tool in order to make -- develop that area I believe. You know, but overall plan for the area, I think once that's in place -- for instance, they have been talking that they're improving Armstrong Park. As we improve straight down Rampart, I think people want to invest some money knows that property on Canal and Claiborne, they can see that where the City is going with it, where this area is going with it. I think if you marry that with the TIF, then certainly you can make that happen. I think it will happen. And I'm in favor of that.

Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE

Let me say that Tax Increment Financing and use of public dollars, as we have had a consultant for the City Council and prior to that, a consultant when we did the River Gardens Wal-Mart Project, should be used to develop economic possibilities in distressed areas. I represent New Orleans East. We have had challenges in bringing economics back. I advocated the use of the TIF early on, for many many years. However, it has to be a strategic plan that is a good deal for a great project. And Tax Increment Financing, now the way that it is structured by the City, is a leveraging project involving the state, so we need some state support. And from a prudent fiscal management approach, it should be last-dollar-in rather than first-dollar-up. But the promise of the TIF and the forward movement of the TIF is certainly an exciting marketing tool. It brings great attention to a community, to an area, and it sometimes jump starts very valuable projects. I support TIF financing in distressed communities for economic projects. And I certainly think that the cultural district compliments other industries in our area such as our arts community and our entertainment community, so you can bring about a multiplicity of wins. Also, from a fighting blight perspective, it is another great win. But, again, you have to structure the deal so that you can get green lights at the state and you can also have green lights in terms of being a wise steward of public dollars.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

I am supportive and have already worked with the DDD to promote this concept. I am confident that a new administration will see the need for such a financing mechanism and move it forward. In addition to the TIF, increased code enforcement efforts have improved Canal Street and will continue to do so. I have worked closely with the DDD to assure that it has coextensive jurisdiction with the city’s code enforcement department to issue citations and hold hearings.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C

Yes, I'm definitely a proponent of a TIF utilized within this fashion because of the unique nature of the theaters and the difficulty I think in raising revenues who have any consistent source. So, yes. I think one of the best ways we can expedite the process is also to -- you-all are insisting on an office -- to expedite the redevelopment of Iberville Housing Development. I think that is a lynchpin in all of this. And I think it affords us a unique opportunity for redevelopment, not just on Canal Street but also for the French Quarter and the surrounding areas in Treme. So I think we really need to look at that. We're all part of -- you know, pieces of the same puzzle. So it will definitely affect Canal Street if we can positively affect Iberville. It's going to be a very large issue. As you may be aware, that is the only housing development currently that has not been sort of rebuilt in District C. It's very near and dear to my heart.

Revenue

In order to manage its operations efficiently, the Downtown Development District needs more timely delivery of its tax revenues and tax collection reports from the City. By law, the DDD is supposed to receive tax revenue collected by the City on the DDD's behalf immediately upon collection.

Do you commit to abiding by this requirement?

Responses
Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE

Oh, absolutely. Yes. Absolutely. You know, I've been called upon to try to expedite that individually when I was District C and once, I think, as -- as President of the Council. And I -- we have to have a serious performance level at the administration -- at the administrative level on how this is handled because it does lead to a lack of revenue. Again, all these things that you've talked about here today that the DDD can do, this will make us money. You haven't mentioned anything yet that will cost us money. If properly done, it will make the City money.

Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE

I committed to it four years ago, and I commit to it now. It's very unfortunate that, you know, it sounds as if not that much has changed terms of the timeliness of DDD getting its payments. You know, this is an executive level function, and, you know, you have -- you certainly have my support to use the bully pulpit and whatever other powers we may have as the city Council to expedite those payments to you.

William Gant
AT-LARGE

It's your money. I mean, what else can be said? It's your money. Certainly you ought to get it. I don't understand or know the reasons why there's a delay. I don't know if it's inability of the functioning of the -- that revenue department that's a problem, or are they holding the money back to dispense among other areas of Government to keep it working? I don't know. But, again, it's your money. And you ought to get it as soon as possible or, as you say, right away. Tomorrow. Yesterday.

Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE

Yes. Yes. As a matter of fact, just on yesterday, we initiated another strategy so that the monies we collect for the SPCA will go directly to the SPCA, by the SPCA being the collectors of the money from rabies license fees. I mean, so there are ways to approach that. We don't need to be a middleman, you know. We just need to make sure that we are a conduit for timely transferral of monies that you deserve. We have suffered through other folks trying to channel our money such as the state when it came to our FEMA funds. So we should really understand how critical delays can be and work to remove any administrative barriers or road blocks. And I would certainly be willing to support whatever gets money to the appropriate and entitled entity with the sense of urgency. That has been the lacking perspective. Where is the urgency?

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

I have lobbied for the administration to pay the DDD in a timely manner and I have personally intervened on several occasions to get the payment made to the DDD. This is, however, an administrative or executive function. The responsibility falls with that branch of government.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C

Yes. I'm not sure how much control City Council has over that. I'm sure it's more in the mayoral purview. However, I am a very strong proponent of being a little bit more involved within the budget process. Basically advocating for all the different departments to have the same type of budget and line items which allows for I think a greater ability to see the process and the scrutiny thereof. I think that would assist. I'm a firm proponent of having a more deliverable based budget as well as the utilization of our computers and having good websites and how to get the information out there to be more transparent. A lot of these services we should be doing online, which are currently not being done.

Economic Development Philosophy

Downtown is New Orleans’ economic engine. It is home to some of the city’s most important institutions and largest taxpayers. The majority of the city’s hotel rooms are downtown, all of the city’s Class A office space, and a large portion of the city’s retail and arts offerings – to name just a few of Downtown’s economic assets.

How do you think economic assets like these should be supported and expanded?

What is your philosophy of and plan for encouraging economic development?

Responses

Jackie Clarkson
AT-LARGE

Well, first of all, we -- we have to have more jobs in this City. And as we continue to build the rest of Federal City, as we continue to build the bioscience industry, we will bring greater demand to the downtown. So the fact that we will -- that you will be doing the streetscaping, the fact that you will be doing the facades, the fact that you will -- that you are a big supporter of the Master Plan and will encourage the rezoning of the upper floors and the fact that you will be doing -- leading these TIFs, you can be a part of turning a lot of these -- this new infusion of people and jobs and taxes and cash investments into making downtown the downtown that you want it to be because the opportunities will be there. We can't bring all these new industries here, whether they are on the Westbank. The Federal City is not just going to help Algiers. The biomedical center isn't just going to help two medical schools. You know, these are bringing us the opportunity for downtown to quadruple in size and its worth if downtown is ready. So that's how I would do it. I would make sure that we had all these things in place as the greater sources of jobs come into -- come into play. Then they begin to create their own sources of economic development. And you have to continue to market the City, branded on the fact that we are more and -- we are more than just the Big Easy. We are -- we are a City that is serious about investment and about business and about a whole downtown, including the arts, including the medical district, including, you know, our retailers, including the hotels and the tourism. It has to be all of the above. We don't do -- I don't think we do quite the job we could do in marketing all of it together.

Arnie Fielkow
AT-LARGE

Well, overall, one of the things that I have worked on -- in many cases spearheaded from the level of the Council -- is the creation of a new economic engine to actually pursue new business for our City. I don't believe that the City's efforts to pursue economic development have been successful. The current model is to go to a public/private partnership that is comprised of both private sector interests, as well as public sector officials, to try to lead the effort to pursue new business and to insure that existing businesses are strong. We're very close to that new model happening in New Orleans. The funding is in place. I am protecting the FISK of the economic development fund as best as possible so that we have a couple of years for financing for that plan once it happens. Really, it only awaits the support and ultimately the signature of a new Mayor and cooperative endeavor agreement to make it happen. Once we create that new model, we will have a real professional organization handling economic development for the City of New Orleans for the first time. And we will be able to work hand in hand with our regional partners at GNO, Inc. and to pursue it. Again, a lot of new industry that I believe exists potentially for New Orleans and to work with our existing businesses, especially our small businesses that are the bread and butter of our City right now that need some attention. This is near the top of my agenda to get off the ground come next spring if I'm elected. And I do believe based upon what the mayoral discussions have been, I think we have a great chance to get it done and accomplished.

William Gant
AT-LARGE

Well, I think this area is well on its way. It got its plans in place it seems to me
What can be added to that? I mean, the plans are there. My concerns mostly would be, to be very frank and honest with you, what are we going to do outside of the DDD. That's my major concern. I don't see anything I would want to come in and change. So naturally you have to be supportive for what's going on. I mean, look, there's some brilliant business folks that's involved in all of this. Well planned activities. So I would just say I would support -- if it makes sense, I would be very supportive of the plans that's already in place. I mean, I see a lot of buildings going up, new buildings going up. Hotels have proliferated since Katrina. Hotels all over the place. So, somebody knows something about what's about to happen or what's going to happen. I don't think people invest that type of money haphazardly. But the question for me still remains: What are -- will there be support by the DDD outside of the area because that's critical also. And certainly there's no City money for that. If you can't get money for down here.

Cynthia Willard-Lewis
AT-LARGE

We have got to have an approach and a strategic plan that builds on the natural assets of our City. From an economic development perspective, it includes the Port, it includes the hospitality industry, it includes transportation which looks at our infrastructure, it includes entertainment. You just referenced the arts district, the cultural district. And it also includes what you spoke about earlier, Kurt, the biomedical. Economic development looks at all of that, and all of those are tapped in Downtown. I think you have to build on your assets and expand them to the next level, which is why I voted for the rebuilding of the Crescent in terms of opening up our number one natural asset to the community and expanding the possibilities of the Port with cruise lines so that we can get more tourists in. But also in terms of our citizens themselves, this would be another way of drawing people downtown, and many of the other initiatives that we've spoken about throughout this interview, such as the biomedical corridor. But importantly at night, the entertainment district which would bring our people downtown at night so that downtown becomes a vibrant, alive, 24/7 experience, not just on one street, but on all of our streets, which I think is very valuable, but it's also financially smart. And so building on those blocks and identifying those critical assets, removing whatever problems exist to their development and prospering is an approach that I would embrace. And that was why I voted for the re-inventing the Crescent and very supportive of strategies that open up the arts and cultural districts so that we can have a 24/7 Downtown that is vibrant as well as what you referenced earlier from a residential perspective, doing things that capture second floors for housing for individuals who want to live -- that want to work and live downtown.

Stacy Head
DISTRICT B

The answer to this question is multi-faceted. It involves improving basic government function to improving our business retention and recruitment model. For example, improving the quality of life downtown through initiatives discussed above (reducing crime, street sweeping, sidewalk repairs, etc.) will attract residential development downtown. This development, in turn, will attract retail and service development. The establishment of the public private partnership for business development will improve the city’s health overall, which will directly and indirectly benefit downtown.

Kristin Palmer
DISTRICT C

I think economic development is -- the best way we can support economic development is through increased quality of life issues. Those are very basic issues. If we can get crime and safety taken care of. If we can get the cleanliness factor. Those things lead to a quality of life which, therefore, is going to promote more economic development. It's going to promote more businesses moving into the area. It's going to promote more residents moving into the area, which then is going to increase businesses, increase retail, increase our restaurant business. I really believe that keeping it simple and focusing on those aspects will do the greatest good in the fastest amount of time.

ddd@neworleansdowntown.com